Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Levesque v. Burlington Police Dept. et al
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Andre Levesque
Defendant:
Burlington Police Department, District Attorney for Concord, NH, Marble Valley Wind Farm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wool v. Vermont, State of
as 1:2013cv00312
Petitioner:
Kirk Wool
Respondent:
Vermont, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dever v. Berch et al
as 5:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
Zygmunt Joe Dever
Defendant:
Paul Berch, Charles Loralls, Vermont State Trooper #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Papazoni v. Shumlin et al
as 2:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
David Papazoni
Defendant:
Peter Shumlin, Vermont State Housing Authority and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogal v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Melanie Rogal
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation , Lyndon State College and Vermont State Colleges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Levesque v. State of Vermont et al
as 5:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Andre Levesque
Defendant:
State of Vermont and Vermont State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackett v. Zhou et al
as 5:2012cv00158
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Hackett
Respondent:
Vermont, State of and Chittenden Criminal Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodman v. Vermont State Police
as 1:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Woodman
Defendant:
Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Long et al
as 2:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas , Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
George H. Long, Dawn Smith-Pliner, Ethan T. Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
