Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Thomas v. Smith, et al
as 23-4124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIN ACE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAUN SMITH, VERNAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DUCHESNE COUNTY ATTORNEY and others
Thomas v. Duchesne County Attorney, et al
as 22-4078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIN ACE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DUCHESNE COUNTY ATTORNEY, GRANT CHARLES, Assistant County Attorney and DUCHESNE COUNTY
Defendant:
SHAUN SMITH, VERNAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN AND JANE DOES, I - V
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Shaun Smith, Duchesne County Clerk, Grant Charles and others
Plaintiff:
Darin Ace Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. State of Utah, et al
as 16-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, ALPINE CITY, AMERICAN FORK CITY and others
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hackford v. State of Utah, et al
as 15-4106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD D. HACKFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, GARY HERBERT, SEAN D. REYES and others
Hackford v. State of Utah, et al
as 15-4090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD D. HACKFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, GARY HERBERT, SEAN D. REYES and others
Collett v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Nathan Samuel Collett
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewray Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Richita Hackford and Opal Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
