Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 26-1150
Petitioner:
Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, New Hampshire Transmission LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Belmont Municipal Light Department, Braintree Electric Light Department, Concord Municipal Light Plant and others
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE v. DOUCETTE
as 1:2026cv00278
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Defendant:
ROBERT G DOUCETTE, JR
Interested Party:
TD BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, STATE OF MAINE, VERSANT POWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 26-1123
Petitioner:
Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, New Hampshire Transmission, LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Belmont Municipal Light Department, Braintree Electric Light Department, Concord Municipal Light Plant and others
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC
as 25-1126
Petitioner:
Louisiana Public Service Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Amicus Curiae:
New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Central Maine Power Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, and Public Service Company of New Hampshire and others
Intervenor:
Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine
Ameren Services Company v. FERC
as 25-1124
Petitioner:
Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Amicus Curiae:
New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Central Maine Power Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, and Public Service Company of New Hampshire and others
Intervenor:
Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 25-1115
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, agent of Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, agent of Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Amicus Curiae:
New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Central Maine Power Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, and Public Service Company of New Hampshire and others
Intervenor:
Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine
Ameren Services Company, et al v. FERC
as 24-2714
Petitioner:
Northern States Power Co. - Wisconsin, Ameren Illinois Company, Commonwealth Edison Company and others
Intervenor:
ITC Great Plains, LLC, ITC Midwest LLC, International Transmission Company, doing business as ITCTransmission and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
