Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Twelve Sixty LLC et al v. Viacom International Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Viacom International Inc. and On-Site Productions Inc.
Plaintiff:
Twelve Sixty LLC , Aron Marderosian and Robert Marderosian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Toni Basil v. New Razor and Tie Enterprises, LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv08728
Plaintiff:
Toni Basil
Defendant:
Central Productions, LLC, Does, Forever 21 Retail, Inc. and others
Viacom International, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.
as 17-56750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California corporation
Sands v. Viacom International Inc.
as 1:2017cv08660
Plaintiff:
Steve Sands
Defendant:
Viacom International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Yang v. Viacom International Inc.
as 1:2017cv07727
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
Viacom International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SANDERS v. MIRACLES FOR FUN USA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03113
Defendant:
BETTER SOURCING WORLDWIDE LTD., KIDS PLAY DISTRIBUTION CO., KMART CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dermansky v. Viacom International Inc.
as 1:2017cv06716
Plaintiff:
Julie Dermansky
Defendant:
Viacom International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rushing et al v. ViacomCBS Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv04492
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rushing and L. L.
Defendant:
Viacom Inc., Upsight, Inc., Viacom International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. Kiloo ApS et al
as 3:2017cv04344
Plaintiff:
P. R. M., Michael McDonald, P. S. M. and others
Defendant:
Tapjoy, Inc., Sybo Games ApS, InMobi Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bechler v. Viacom International Inc.
as 1:2017cv05479
Plaintiff:
Shane Bechler
Defendant:
Viacom International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
