Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Brown v. Sullo et al
as 1:2024cv03360
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Brown
Defendant:
G. Sullo, C. Fogg, Sgt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Sledge v. Martha M. Pacold
as 24-1031
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SLEDGE
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
Interested Party:
VILLAGE OF MELROSE PARK
Village of Melrose Park, Illinois v. Chessie Logistics Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv14349
Plaintiff:
Village of Melrose Park, Illinois
Defendant:
Chessie Logistics Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Macias v. Pitassi et al
as 1:2023cv13988
Plaintiff:
Enzo Macias
Defendant:
Sam J. Pitassi and The Village of Melrose Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Sledge v. Village of Melrose Park
as 23-2328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SLEDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF MELROSE PARK
Brown v. Village of Melrose Park et al
as 1:2022cv05491
Plaintiff:
DEVANTE M. BROWN
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Officer G. Sullo and Officer C. Fogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sledge v. Village of Melrose Park, The
as 1:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sledge
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Schiller et al
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Makaela Thomas, Trymelle L. Johnson, Derrius Gipson and others
Defendant:
James Schiller, Jesus Tejeda, Marco Sullo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bravo et al v Village of Melrose Park et al
as 1:2021cv06813
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bravo and Fernanda Bravo
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park Illinois, International Bank of Chicago, Carl Capra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed v. Melrose Park et al
as 1:2021cv01048
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Ahmed
Defendant:
officer sullo, Village of Melrose Park and Sullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
