Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Ratcliff v. Lines
as 1:2020cv00763
Respondent:
Vince Lines
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Western Acceptance LLC v. SXIP, LLC, General et al
as 1:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Phil Tagami, Vince Frere, General Agriculture Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Western Acceptance LLC and Western Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. v. Verona Nails & Spa, LLC
as 1:2019cv02447
Defendant:
Verona Nails & Spa, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Joseph v. Line
as 1:2019cv02271
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Joseph
Defendant:
Arapahoe County
Respondent:
Vince Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nowlin v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv02374
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe, Colorado , David Walcher , Louie Perea and others
Plaintiff:
Nicol Nowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Olguin v. City of Pueblo et al
as 1:2017cv01907
Plaintiff:
Richard Olguin
Defendant:
City of Pueblo, City of Pueblo Police Department, The, County of Pueblo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Suarez et al
as 1:2015cv01960
Plaintiff:
George Walker
Defendant:
Vince Suarez and Kevin Stoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Colorado Springs, The et al
as 1:2014cv01471
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Brown
Defendant:
City of Colorado Springs, The, Peter Carey, Vince Niski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v Daniels
as 1:2013cv02256
Petitioner:
Vince Edward Wilson
Respondent:
Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Domanski et al v. General Parts Distribution LLC
as 1:2013cv00471
Movant:
Ken Domanski , Richard Jones , Jason Kirby and others
Objector:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dd Fed. Question: Discovery Disputes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
