Cases 1 - 10 of 82
(PC) Ray, Jr. v. Cates, et al.
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Angel Ribera, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ray v. Cates, et al.
as 1:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Angel Ribera, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZEUPIFATUUNG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13407
Plaintiff:
VINCENT RAY ZEUPIFATUUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edward Ray, Jr. v. California Superior Court
as 22-15081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT
Edward Ray, Jr. v. William Sullivan, et al
as 21-16705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden, Warden at CCI, LEWIS, Sergeant at CCI, EATON, Corrections Sergeant at CCI and others
Arthur Wofford, et al v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 21-1878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR WOFFORD and VINCENT RAY
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, GARY LANIGAN, Commissioner, New Jersey Dept. of Corrections and BEVERLY HASTINGS, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison
Edward Ray, Jr. v. S. Chefalo
as 21-15238
Defendant / Appellee:
S. CHEFALO, Sergeant at CCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
(PC) Ray v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv01699
Defendant:
William Joe Sullivan, Medovitch, Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ray v. Chefalo
as 1:2020cv01515
Defendant:
S. Chefalo
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ray v. Hosey, et al.
as 1:2020cv01076
Defendant:
B. Cates, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
