Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Johnson et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05244
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Johnson and James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv16674
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv03262
Defendant:
Virginia Johnson, Taquisha N Jackson and The Unknown Heirs at Law of Jeanette Jackson
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of A subpoena issued to the United States District court, Middle District of Louisiana, the Office of the Clerk by Virginia Johnson
as 3:2013cv00292
In The Matter Of:
A subpoena issued to the United States District court, Middle District of Louisiana, the Office of the Clerk by Virginia Johnson
Interested Party:
Virginia Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Johnson et al v. Anh H. Regent d/b/a Regent & Associates, LLP et al
as 4:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Eright Johnson and Virginia Johnson
Defendant:
Anh H. Regent d/b/a Regent & Associates, LLP and Unifund CCR Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boutte v. Virginia Johnson, as Administrator of the Texas Best Staff Leasing, Inc. d/b/a Alt-Source Occupational Injury Benefit Plan
as 1:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Arthur Boutte
Defendant:
Virginia Johnson, as Administrator of the Texas Best Staff Leasing, Inc. d/b/a Alt-Source Occupational Injury Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
