Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roy Perry-Bey v. Donald Trump
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY and CARLOS A. HOWARD, F.S.P.
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Carlos Howard v. Donald Trump
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. HOWARD, F.S.P. and ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Perry-Bey et al v. Trump et al.
as 1:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Carlos A. Howard, F.S.P.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump, Virginia State Board of Elections and Virginia Department of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Paul Goldman v. Robert Brink
as 21-2180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JOHN O'BANNON, Vice Chair of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia, in his official capacity
Phipps et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clate Phipps, I, Sheila "Samm" Tittle and Constitution Party of Virginia
Defendant:
Chairman of the State Board of Elections, Virginia State Board of Elections, Commissioner of the State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Aaron Luciani v. VA State Board of Elections
as 20-1866
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JESSICA BOWMAN, Deputy Commissioner of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON LUCIANI, Independent Candidate for U. S. House of Representatives
Kenneth H. Adams v. James B. Alcorn
as 15-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
24TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE and KENNETH H. ADAMS, individually and as Chairman of the 24th Senatorial District Republican Committee
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
DANIEL MOXLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. ALCORN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, CLARA BELLE WHEELER, in her official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, SINGLETON B. MCALLISTER, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections and others
Daniel Moxley v. James B. Alcorn
as 15-1483
Plaintiff:
24TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE and KENNETH H. ADAMS, individually and as Chairman of the 24th Senatorial District Republican Committee
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MOXLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. ALCORN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, CLARA BELLE WHEELER, in her official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, SINGLETON B. MCALLISTER, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections and others
Langhorne et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2013cv00702
Defendant:
Kimberly Bowers, Virginia State Board of Elections, Charlie Judd and others
Plaintiff:
Arelia S. Langhorne and Howard M. Butler
Petitioner:
William J. Howell, Virginia House of Delegates, Kathy J. Byron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles Judd
as 12-1996
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, in his official capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her official capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and DON PALMER, in his offical capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
