Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MORGAN v. USV OPTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv07485
Plaintiff:
LACIE MORGAN
Defendant:
USV OPTICAL, INC. and U.S. VISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TORRES v. U.S. VISION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv06558
Plaintiff:
IAN TORRES
Defendant:
U.S. VISION, INC. and USV OPTICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ODELL v. U.S. VISION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv06753
Plaintiff:
Bonita Odell
Defendant:
U.S. VISION, INC., USV OPTICAL, INC. and Nationwide Optometry, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CRISTIANO v. COOPER VISION, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CRISTIANO
Defendant:
COOPER VISION, INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., BAUSCH + LOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
U.S. VISION, INC. v. THE MCGEE GROUP, INC.
as 1:2012cv04902
Plaintiff:
U.S. VISION, INC.
Defendant:
THE MCGEE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
U.S. VISION, INC. v. AS IP HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2011cv01892
Plaintiff:
U.S. VISION, INC.
Defendant:
AS IP HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Feliciano v. Concepts In Vision Inc.
as 2:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Carl Feliciano
Defendant:
Concepts In Vision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDCROSS et al v. PEARLE VISION, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv03844
Plaintiff:
DONALD REDCROSS and FELICIA REDCROSS
Defendant:
PEARLE VISION, INC., PEARLE VISION #6294, LUXOTTICA GROUP Spa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
PARTNERS IN VISION, INC. et al v. VOGT et al
as 2:2009cv02110
Plaintiff:
PARTNERS IN VISION, INC. and VIP OPITCAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
SHARON M. VOGT, GLENN MOYER and CAREFREE OPTICAL AND CENTER FOR CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
