Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crabill v. LCA-Vision Inc
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Maren Crabill
Defendant:
LCA-Vision Inc doing business as LasikPlus doing business as Joffe Docket No. Medicenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Megha v. LCA-Vision Inc.
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
OD Anita Megha
Defendant:
LCA-Vision Inc. dba Lasik Plus and LCA-Vision Inc. doing business as Lasik Plus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LCA Vision Inc et al v. Goel et al
as 1:2019cv00818
Defendant:
Baltimore Eye Physicians, LLC, First Sight Vision Care, LLC and Sanjay Desh Goel
Plaintiff:
Columbus Eye Associates, Inc., LCA Vision Inc and LCA-Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Lucas v. Total Security Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lucas
Defendant:
Total Security Vision, Inc. and Mohammad A. Ullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MV Circuit Design, Inc. v. Omnicell, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02028
Defendant:
Omnicell, Inc. , Rioux Vision, Inc. and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP
Plaintiff:
MV Circuit Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith v. National Vision, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02575
Plaintiff:
Shalina Smith
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. plyam et al
as 1:2008cv00227
Defendant:
gregory plyam, Plyam of Chicago, Inc., Plyam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pearle Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
