Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael W. Roberts v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03096
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillip W. Roberts v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02679
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Myers v. Aiken County et al
as 1:2023cv01495
Plaintiff:
Patricia Myers
Defendant:
Aiken County, Aiken County Sheriff's Office, Deputy William T. Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Roberts, Jr. v. Warden Kendall
as 2:2022cv03578
Petitioner:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Kendall
as 2:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Emory W Roberts, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardell v. Ace Electronics et al
as 0:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Wendel R. Wardell, Jr. and W. Robert Wardell
Defendant:
Charles Hawkins, Andrew Mansukhani, Ace Electronics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wardell et al v. Royster
as 0:2018mc00255
Plaintiff:
W. Robert Wardell, Jr. and Don Mitchell Wilborn
Defendant:
Renea Royster
Roberts v. Lewis
as 2:2017cv00453
Petitioner:
Emory W Roberts, Jr
Respondent:
Dwayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Emory W Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Dwayne Lewis, Randy Demory, Captain Phyall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
