Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Taylor, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Taylor, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sundquist v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv03598
Defendant:
Mary Alice W. Taylor, Michael L. Eskew, Siddharth N. Mehta and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Sundquist and Kimberly Petersen
Petitioner:
Norma Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. De Mello
as 3:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
George W. Taylor
Defendant:
Sean De Mello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Douglas W. Taylor
Defendant:
Marc Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Associated Bank et al v. Taylor
as 1:2009cv01340
Plaintiff:
Associated Bank and National Assocation
Defendant:
Lester W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Associated Bank et al v. Taylor
as 2:2009cv02258
Plaintiff:
Associated Bank and National Assocation
Defendant:
Lester W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
USA v. Taylor et al
as 3:2009cv00799
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Derrick W. Taylor and Brooke N. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Baley et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baley, Thomas Baley, Lisa Beard and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 27 Welfare and Pension Funds v. Taylor
as 1:2008cv00933
Plaintiff:
Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 27 Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant:
Otis W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
USA v. Taylor et al
as 3:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Derrick W. Taylor and Brooke N. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
