Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Twelfth Congressional District, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia, et al
as 21-10183
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA, in his official capacity, ANH LE, in their official capacity as Members of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN W. TUCKER, an individual voter and resident of Richmond County, CATHY A. LATHAM, a 2020 candidate for Presidential Elector, EDWARD T. METZ, a 2020 candidate for Presidential Elector and others
Interested Party:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GEORGIA, INC., DSCC, GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and others
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Diana Anhalt, et al
as 20-3393
Defendant:
JUDGE DIANA LOUISE ANHALT, JUDGE LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, JUDGE LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, Esq., SUPERVISING JUDGE LEON W. TUCKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE IDEE FOX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Lynn W. Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06114
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-03576
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and The UPS Store, Inc.
Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03576
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and The UPS Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arlie W. Tucker v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77003
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Arlie W. Tucker
Mack W. Tucker v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-72784
Defendant:
Abco Industries, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mack W. Tucker
CARLSEN V US
as 07-5011
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Charles Carlsen, John T. Damico, John W. Tucker, Sr. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
