Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Larobina v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 14-2961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent P. Larobina
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Wachovia Corporation, Wells Fargo, N.A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Bullen et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2014cv03185
Defendant:
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Wachovia Corporation and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Claudette Bullen, Edward Bullen and Matthew Bullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vangelakos et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv06574
Plaintiff:
George Vangelakos , Ian King , Joseph Koronakis and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo & Company, WFC Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freidus v. ING Group N.V.
as 12-4514
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Zemprelli, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marshall Freidus, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Incorporated, A.G. Edwards &Sons, Inc., Wachovia Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ING Group N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Fred S. Hubbell and others
Scutts et al v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv07194
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Scutts , David Fernandez and Jim Akasala
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Freidus v. ING Group N.V.
as 12-3748
Plaintiff:
Marshall Freidus, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated and Edward P. Zemprelli, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Movant - Appellant:
Joseph Silliman
Defendant - Appellee:
ING Group N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Fred S. Hubbell and others
Capurso v. Bank & Banking
as 12-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Wall Street, New York, The U.S. Stock Market & Land Use, Areas, & unauthorized, Land use, areas & disclosures, re: district, newspaper, 10/14/2011, 8/5/2011, &wall street journal the wall street journal & the new york almanac, the almanac of record, wall , Carleon Corporate Mercers or Acquisitions in United States, Post 1950, Since 1995 to current see the World Almanac and Book of Facts Year 2003, Pg 121, Eastern, States, Bank &Banking, Credit Card Association, Credit Cards, Rare, Laws, Regulations & Rules, in current & recent, , for past 1900 of, for 2000 of, since past 1900 of, since 1900 of, all named of and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Munial, Seattle, Washington, doing business in State of New York & in State of California in a being aquired by JP Morgan Chase Bank, since 2001, Congress of the United States, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., doing business in States, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, & Utah, & Elsewhere, credit card purchases, interest rate, & minimum, payment, increase as of 11/20/2011 and others
Arace v. Thompson
as 11-3840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sandra Arace, derivatively on behalf of Wachovia Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Ruth G. Shaw, Peter C. Browning and others
Objector - Appellant:
R.A. Feuer
Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Wachovia Corporation
as 11-1752
Plaintiff:
Deka Fundmaster Investmentgesellschaft MBH and International Fund Management S.A. Luxemburg
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Forsta AP-fonden, Deka Investment GmbH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Wachovia Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, Kennedy G. Thompson and others
In re Wachovia Equity Securiti
as 11-1755
Plaintiff:
Morton Lipetz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Evelyn Jean Lipetz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
New York City Pension Funds, New York City Board of Education Retirement System, New York City Employees Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Wachovia Corporation, G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
