Cases 1 - 10 of 641
Riveros v. Robles et al
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Carol Juliana Riveros
Defendant:
Jonathan Humberto Robles, Ayala's Transport, Inc., Wade Hampton Wiles, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. Law Nation Sports LLC
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC
Defendant:
Law Nation Sports LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. OTC Bar LLC
as 3:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
OTC Bar LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Theatro Labs Inc
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
Theatro Labs Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. DCH Realty LLC
as 4:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC
Defendant:
DCH Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Urban Structure LLC
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
Urban Structure LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Wade v. Zavala et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wade
Defendant:
Luis Edgar Aguero Zavala and Wesco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
