Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jeffrey-Steven of the House of Jarrett v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey-Steven of the House of Jarrett
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Judiciary of Hawaii, Annalisa Beranard-Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wade v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Admin General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stroeve v. Massie et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Stroeve
Defendant:
Timothy Massie, Alan Brissette, Wade Ikehara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Recktenwald et al
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Roberson
Defendant:
Mark Recktenwald, Judge Jeffrey Hawk, Supreme Court, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rodrigues v. USA
as 1:2016cv00149
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wade T. Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tierney v. Sgt Tapu et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Sgt Tapu, Brayden Wade Kalahiki and City and County of Honolulu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Itagaki v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Wade T. Itagaki, Wade T. Itagaki, Wade T. Itagaki and others
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Clayton Frank, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
