Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Wade v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Robin Wade
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
NCMIC Insurance Company v. Folske et al
as 0:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
NCMIC Insurance Company
Defendant:
Wade Kurt Folske, Folske Spine & Rehab Clinic, P.A. and Sherilyn Sheroian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Arrington v. Street et al
as 0:2022cv02362
Plaintiff:
Gideon C. Arrington, II
Defendant:
Dyanna L. Street, Anthony C. Palumbo, Wade A. Kish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Miller-Wade v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv02025
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dakota Miller-Wade
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Forbush v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Wade Forbush
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Creager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02592
Plaintiff:
Gordon Creager, Melissa Bagwell, Roderick Barris and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Aitken et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aitken, Edwin Among, Christopher Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Hazel Hyleman, Sean Raskosky, Marcus Carter and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02380
Plaintiff:
Shaunda Robb, Michael Berg, Lynda Delaney and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
