Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wade v. Kijakazi et al
as 4:2023cv03240
Plaintiff:
Edward Wade
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wade v. Pottawattamie County
as 8:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kirstie Wade
Defendant:
Pottawattamie County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wade v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Della Christine Wade
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wade v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Della Christine Wade
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hansmeier Land & Cattle v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03051
Plaintiff:
Hansmeier Land & Cattle
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Orr v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03054
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Plaintiff:
John Orr
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Kingsley Cattle Co. v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03052
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Plaintiff:
Kingsley Cattle Co.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Meyer Bros v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03043
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Plaintiff:
Meyer Bros
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Perrin v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03046
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Plaintiff:
Jim Perrin
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Lemmert Hay and Grinding, LLC v. Hill et al
as 4:2018mc03053
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Hill and Wade Brandon Hill
Plaintiff:
Lemmert Hay and Grinding, LLC
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
