Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RHODEN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv04589
Plaintiff:
AMIR RHODEN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cucci v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01708
Plaintiff:
Rose Cucci
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Milford Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HUNTER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv03841
Plaintiff:
TINA HUNTER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FREEMAN et al v. SAM'S EAST INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01786
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE FREEMAN and BRADLEY WARD
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC. , SAM'S WEST INC. , SAM'S CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLLINS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
JANELL HOLLINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LUBITZ v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN et al
as 5:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN LUBITZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
QUILES et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2016cv09479
Plaintiff:
SUNDEL QUILES , VICTORIA J MARTIN , JAMES M SHEA and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Sandra Jackson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOWARD v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv07622
Plaintiff:
SAMIKA HOWARD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOUSEY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01337
Plaintiff:
SHANEIS HOUSEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , KELLY AYERS-ROSSER , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
