Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RHODEN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv04589
Plaintiff:
AMIR RHODEN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cucci v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01708
Plaintiff:
Rose Cucci
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Milford Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HOLLINS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
JANELL HOLLINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LUBITZ v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN et al
as 5:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN LUBITZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PAOLICELLI v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
as 2:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAOLICELLI
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SWANK v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
as 2:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SWANK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
JENKO v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
JAMES JENKO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
BROWN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2012cv02704
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRAMBLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05863
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BRAMBLE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
RATKOVICH v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv01479
Plaintiff:
ZORICA RATKOVICH
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and THE ASSOCIATES' HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
