Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
SMITH v. WALGREEN COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01537
Plaintiff: DONALD SMITH
Defendant: WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WIMBERLY et al v. INVENT HELP et al
as 1:2010cv00930
Defendant: CHRIS CARMAN, CVS, GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: AMANDA COLLINS, LILITH HUTCHENSON, JILL A. WIMBERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MCDOUGALLE v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff: KATHERINE MCDOUGALLE
Defendant: WALGREEN CO., WALGREEN CO. and WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
C.M. et al v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2009cv00959
Plaintiff: C.M., SHERRY MCCAMMACK and CRAIG MCCAMMACK
Defendant: WALGREEN CO. and WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MAYBERRY et al v. WALGREEN CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00837
Plaintiff: ERIC MAYBERRY and SANDRA MAYBERRY
Defendant: WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
THEARD v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2009cv00668
Plaintiff: THOMAS THEARD
Defendant: WALGREEN CO. and WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TESTERMAN v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2009cv00316
Plaintiff: SHERYLE TESTERMAN
Defendant: WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
WATT v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2008cv00483
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL WATT and CRYSTAL WATT
Defendant: WALGREEN CO. and WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COWAN v. WALGREEN, CO.
as 1:2008cv00764
Plaintiff: GLENDA COWAN
Defendant: WALGREEN, CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?