Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Ables, et al. v Walgreen Co.
as 3:2021cv02460
Plaintiff:
Trisha Clara-Aedo, Leonard Patane, Sarah Wright and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Illinois Corporation and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mejia v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreen Co./Ill.
Plaintiff:
Lucas Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Whittington v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
Charles Whittington
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
President v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2020cv06474
Plaintiff:
Kenneth President
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
President v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2020cv06530
Plaintiff:
Kenneth President
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neuhoff v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2020cv02439
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Neuhoff
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
McGill v. Walgreen Co.
as 9:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Stacy J. McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilar et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Coffaro, Daniel Buck, Katherine Pearson and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcie Le v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 8:2018cv01548
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Marcie Le and Karen Dao
Special Master:
Jay C Gandhi
Other:
Christina Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christina Epstein v. Walgreen Pharmacy Services Midwest, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv01323
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Pharmacy Services Midwest, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Christina Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
