Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Veraseal LLC v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Veraseal LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Veraseal LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Veraseal LLC
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Bericap Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Closure System International, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation and Walgreen Co.
Intervenor Defendant:
Closure Systems International, Inc. and Novembal USA, Inc.
Undetermined:
Richard Grainger
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart et al
as 6:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Venable v. Walgreens, Co.
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Nancy Venable
Defendant:
Walgreens, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aeritas, LLC v. Walgreen Co
as 6:2016cv01283
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Aeritas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Location Services IP, LLC v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2016cv00382
Plaintiff:
Location Services IP, LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Bessette et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2015cv01197
Plaintiff:
Luc Bessette and Bessette Intellectual Property, LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NexusCard, Inc. v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
NexusCard, Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
