Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hicks v. Walgreens et al
as 3:2023cv50031
Plaintiff: Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant: Walgreens, Rockford Police Department and State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Walgreens Corporate
as 1:2019cv02458
Plaintiff: Ethel Lee Hill Todd
Defendant: Walgreens Corporate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Todd v. Chatonda et al
as 1:2019cv02320
Defendant: African Family in Africa, Frank Chatonda, Rosita Chatonda and others
Plaintiff: Ethel Lee Hill Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howze v. Unknown Security Officer et al
as 1:2017cv02989
Plaintiff: Jermaine Howze
Defendant: Certain Unknown Chicago Police Officers, Civilain Detention Aides, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaudoin v. Miss Lee, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff: Christina Marie Beaudoin
Defendant: Miss Lee, LLC and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
McGill v. Walgreens Corp
as 1:2016cv07909
Plaintiff: Willie McGill
Defendant: Walgreens Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed et al v. Mackey et al
as 1:2016cv00350
Plaintiff: Carl Reed and Constance Haliburton-Reed
Defendant: John P. Mackey, Whole Foods Market-Midwest Inc, Whole Foods Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sloan v. Walgreens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv08301
Plaintiff: Demetrius Sloan
Defendant: Walgreens and Walgreens Security Guard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed et al v. Office of Cook County et al
as 1:2014cv08300
Plaintiff: Carl Reed and Constance Haliburton-Bryant
Defendant: Office of Cook County, C.R. Walgreen & Company, Walgreen's Store #04752 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentile v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2013cv08650
Plaintiff: Matthew Gentile
Defendant: Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?