Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Muller-Colon v. USA
as 3:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Walter D. Muller-Colon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Amezquita v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2019cv01918
Interested Party:
Staff Attorneys
Plaintiff:
Edgar Arroyo Amezquita
Defendant:
United States of America and Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Merced-Nieves v. USA
as 3:2017cv02046
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter Merced-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cruz-Berrios v. Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2016cv03155
Plaintiff:
Jose Julian Cruz-Berrios
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Einar Ramos-Lopez, Lesty Borrero-Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Soto-Hernandez
as 3:2015cv01280
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rivera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walter Soto-Hernandez, Cesar Miranda, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Caraballo-Cepeda v. El Estado Centro Judicial
as 3:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
Waneget Caraballo-Cepeda
Defendant:
El Estado Centro Judicial , Walter Soto and Cesar Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Filomeno-Cruz v. Soto et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Plaintiff:
Obed Filomeno-Cruz
Defendant:
Walter Soto and Luis Sanchez-Betances
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merced-Nieves v. USA
as 3:2012cv01652
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter Merced-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sealed Defendant 5 v. USA
as 3:2010cv01756
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter Mangual-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Romero-Galindez v. Pereira-Castillo et al
as 3:2010cv01684
Plaintiff:
M/W ANGEL Romero-Galindez
Defendant:
Miguel Pereira-Castillo, Carlos Molina-Rodriguez and Walter Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
