Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,443
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant: HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trochez, Camilo J. v. Warden Heuett et al
as 1:2024cv21496
Plaintiff: Camilo Josue Trochez
Defendant: Warden Heuett and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner: Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pariss Kimbrough v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11205
Petitioner: PARISS SHEVEE KIMBROUGH
Respondent: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TUTWILER PRISON WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Chambers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner: John William Martin
Respondent: Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner: Jonathan Hill
Respondent: Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Marcus Wright
as 24-11155
Petitioner: In re: MARCUS WRIGHT
Respondent: USP COLEMAN II WARDEN and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner: April Paw
Respondent: Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?