Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Saez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv11031
Plaintiff:
Juan Saez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Acting Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Block v. Boncher et al
as 1:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
Amy Boncher, Sincada, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Boston Police et al
as 1:2022cv12233
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Boston Police, Boston Police Officers, John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. McFarland
as 1:2022cv11879
Petitioner:
Elliett Sharpe
Respondent:
Warden Boncher and Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yancey v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2022cv11790
Plaintiff:
Edward Scott Yancey
Defendant:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Giacomuzzi v. Carter
as 4:2022cv40090
Petitioner:
Meghan Giacomuzzi
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Carswell, Ricardo R. Carter and Thomas Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v.Boncher
as 1:2022cv11082
Petitioner:
Miles Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McFadden v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv30062
Plaintiff:
Tedkieya McFadden
Defendant:
Warden, Pullen, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Good v. Gray
as 1:2021cv11812
Petitioner:
John J Good, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
