Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Doss v. Brooks
as 1:2023cv01449
Petitioner: Jeffrey Doss
Respondent: Warden Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. BROOKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00201
Petitioner: LEROY WILSON, III
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff: DARRELL D CROSS
Defendant: CHIEF UNIT MANGER STEVEN DUPREE, UNIT MANAGER EUGENE SAPP, WARDEN HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Brooks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00014
Defendant: Telfair State Prison, Deputy Spires, Mrs. Clark and others
Plaintiff: Torrey Coleman, Devin Thomas and Chad R. Wofford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Brooks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00076
Plaintiff: Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant: Sheriff Waldrop, David McDade, Douglas County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KITCHENS v BROOKS
as 5:2019cv00399
Petitioner: DEONTE M KITCHENS
Defendant: WARDEN and WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARRUTH v. BROOKS
as 3:2019cv00067
Petitioner: PONEIL CARRUTH
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Brooks et al
as 1:2019cv03113
Plaintiff: Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant: Rodney McCloud, Warden Nathan Brooks and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. BROOKS
as 1:2019cv00044
Petitioner: CAMERON WRIGHT
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. BROOKS
as 1:2019cv00020
Undetermined: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Petitioner: LOYCE HARRIS
Respondent: WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?