Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Arley Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Asberry v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Johnny Asberry
Defendant:
Phillips State Prison, Warden Thomas, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00331
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, WARDEN BERRY, UNIT MANAGER KANE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. GRIMES et al
as 5:2018cv00326
Defendant:
NURSE GRIMES, COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER and DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00234
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, UNIT MANAGER KANE, WARDEN BERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Georgia et al
as 5:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Clark
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Shevondah Fields, William Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Williams et al
as 4:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Arvin Russell
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Thomas, Medical Director Fogan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Russell v. Williams et al
as 5:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Arvin Russell
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Thomas, Medical Director Fogan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
