Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Hogan et al
as 2:2026cv13120
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Hogan, Jacob Gumbos, W.D Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burgess v. 15th District Court et al
as 2:2026cv13071
Plaintiff:
Vincent Burgess
Defendant:
15th District Court, Shryl Samborn, 22nd Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. Washtenaw County Trial Court et al
as 2:2026cv12887
Plaintiff:
Vince Burgess
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Trial Court, ADA Coordinator, Teresa Killeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinson v. Ann Arbor Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv12222
Plaintiff:
Tracey Alexander Vinson
Defendant:
Ann Arbor Police Department, Washtenaw County Community Mental Health, Joseph Ganga and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jenuwine v. Washtenaw, County of et al
as 2:2026cv11937
Plaintiff:
Larry Jenuwine
Defendant:
Washtenaw, County of, Jacob Gombos, Jonathan Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv11812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Temirian v. Washtenaw County Government
as 2:2026cv11542
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Government
Plaintiff:
Shant A Temirian [E-Filer]
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Claudia Moeller v. University of Toledo, et al
as 26-1409
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MOELLER
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO and WASHTENAW COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
Richard Smith, Sr. v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, et al
as 26-1379
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MICHIGAN, JEROME W. ZIMMER, JR., Chief Clerk of the Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
