Cases
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60614
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant: PAMELA JEFFERSON, GREGORY PARTMAN, LASTER SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: JIM HOOD
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-60446
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2011cv00033
Defendant: Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Wayne County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Wayne County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Plaintiff: Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Leah Parson
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?