Cases 21 - 30 of 48
McBride v. Most et al
as 8:2020cv03002
Defendant:
Wilser, Mr. Wayne Hill, C. Gilpin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv02531
Defendant:
Kristofer Davis, Commissioner Wayne Hill, Lander Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harrison v. DPSCS - Secretary et al
as 8:2020cv02274
Defendant:
John Doe - DEA, CPL Luna, Robin Woolford and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moon v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv02171
Defendant:
Mrs. Cheedi, Warden Philip J. Morgan, Dr. Krishnaswamy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01892
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Boyd K. Rutherford, Warden Walter West and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Levy v. Hogan et al
as 8:2020cv01905
Defendant:
Dr. Lynda Bonieskie, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Chief Orlando Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnte Anne Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chew v. Hill et al
as 8:2020cv01725
Defendant:
Lieutenant Roman, Sergeant Walker, Warden Allen Gang and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Chew
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Neale v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Robert L. Greene, Walter Holmes, Boyd K. Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Kindall Neale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rienhardt v. Hogan et al
as 8:2020cv01011
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Boyd K. Rutherford, Walter Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Rienhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morris v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
F. Todd Taylor and Wayne Hill
Plaintiff:
Bradon Morris
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
