Cases 1 - 10 of 41
King v. Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Warden of WCI and Officer Fern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Lonnie White
Defendant:
Warden of WCI and Officer Fern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holden v. Donaldson et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Holden
Defendant:
D. Donaldson, Sr., Nurse K. Coleman, WCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. WCI et al
as 1:2023cv02796
Petitioner:
Wayne Jordan
Respondent:
WCI, State of Maryland, Warden Ronald S. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copez v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Marquis Copez
Defendant:
Ryan Pratt, Lee Brown, Markel Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. WCI Officers
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
David King
Defendant:
John L. Norton, III and WCI Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ronald Shane Weber et al
as 1:2022cv02707
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Ronald Shane Weber and Medical Department of WCI
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
Eric Poole and Eric Von Poole
Defendant:
R. Roderick, Paul Wheeler, WCI's ARP Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. WCI
as 1:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Juan Randolph
Defendant:
WCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. WCI Account Clerks Manager
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
WCI Account Clerks Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
