Cases 1 - 5 of 5
IN RE: PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 1:2007cv02867
Defendant:
CHENANGO VALLEY PET FOODS, MENU FOODS OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, ROYAL CANIN and others
Plaintiff:
TERESA EILERS, PATRICIA KAY, NICK JACKSON and others
Interested Party:
DONALD RICHARDSON
Not Classified By Court:
DUSTIN TURNER, Daniel Kaffer, Margaret Picus and others
Petitioner:
PAUL N PAQUETTE and AVA PAQUETTE
In Re:
PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAGE et al v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62898
Plaintiff:
DONALD W PAGE, DONALD W PAGE, DONALD W PAGE and others
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FARR v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv03898
Plaintiff:
ANITA FARR and ANITA FARR
Defendant:
PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC., PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC., NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC. and NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC.
Cross Claimant:
PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC. and PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY, NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC. and NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SNELL et al v. DICK VAN PATTEN'S NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02192
Plaintiff:
WINSTON DAVID SNELL and JENNIFER SNELL
Defendant:
DICK VAN PATTEN'S NATURAL BALANCE PET FOODS, INC. and WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEMITH et al v. NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv00959
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DEMITH and KATHLEEN DEMITH
Defendant:
NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, NESTLE S.A., NESTLE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
