Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Sierra Club, et al v. FERC
as 20-1512
Petitioner:
Indian Creek Watershed Association, Wild Virginia, Preserve Craig and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Appalachian Voices v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
as 20-2159
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, CINDY SCHULZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Petitioner:
INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, PRESERVE GILES COUNTY, WILD VIRGINIA and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2042
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILD VIRGINIA, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL PATRICK V. KINSMAN, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM T. WALKER, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District and others
Wild Virginia et al v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
as 3:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
David Sligh and Wild Virginia
Defendant:
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wild Virginia et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mountaintrue, Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley, The Clinch Coalition and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Intervenor Defendant:
American Petroleum Institute, Federal Forest Resource Council, National Cattlemen's Beef Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Wild Virginia, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
as 19-1866
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, CINDY SCHULZ, in her official capacity as Field Supervisor, Virginia Ecological Services, Responsible Official and others
Sierra Club v. State Water Control Board
as 17-2406
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, APPALACHIAN VOICES, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and others
Respondent:
STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD, ROBERT DUNN, Chair of the State Water Control Board, HEATHER WOOD, Vice-Chair of the State Water Control Board and others
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Amicus Supporting Petitioner:
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED
Sierra Club, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service
as 17-2399
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., APPALACHIAN VOICES and WILD VIRGINIA, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Amicus Supporting Petitioner:
CHEROKEE FOREST VOICES, THE CLINCH COALITION, GEORGIA FORESTWATCH and others
:
Center for Biological Div, et al v. EPA, et al
as 11-1285
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Natural Resources Council of Maine and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Southeastern Legal Foundation, v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner:
John Shimkus, U.S. Representative, Illinois 19th District, John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Glass Association of North America, State of North Carolina, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Municipal Gas Commission of Missouri and American Chemistry Council
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
