Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Copes v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
Shameek Copes
Respondent:
Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Cope et al
as 5:2019cv00436
Defendant:
Great West Casualty and Jerrod Malek Cope
Plaintiff:
Olga Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMS Financial JDC LP v. Cope et al
as 5:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
SMS Financial JDC LP
Defendant:
Cary Cope , PJN Corporation , Pamela J Neibauer and others
Counter_claimant:
Cary Cope , Pamela J Neibauer and PJN Corporation
Counter_defendant:
SMS Financial JDC LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cope
as 4:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Laura J Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cope v. Hollis Roofing, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Nowatha J. Cope
Defendant:
Hollis Roofing, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirby v. Felcor TRS Borrower 1 LP et al
as 4:2008cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deidra Cope Kirby
Defendant:
Felcor TRS Borrower 1 LP, Felcor TRS Borrower GP 1, L.L.C., Felcor Lodging Trust, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
