Cases 1 - 10 of 19
William L. Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 17-1485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, BANK OF AMERICAN PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLP, CHARLES K. GIFFORD and others
Willam L. Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 14-1011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, BANK OF AMERICAN PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, CHARLES K. GIFFORD, JAMES H. HANCE, JR. and others
IN RE: Bank of America Corp.
as 13-1883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Public Pension Funds, The Public Pension Fund Group, Steven J. Sklar, as (IRA Account Beneficiary), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corp., Gary A. Carlin, Nelson Chai and others
Objector - Appellant:
Matthew A. Pinsly
Graber et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv07070
Plaintiff:
Steve R. Graber
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, Joel L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
William Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 11-1668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLP and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, CHARLES K. GIFFORD, JAMES H. HANCE, JR. and others
In Re: Bank of America Corp.
as 10-3899
Plaintiff:
Public Pension Funds, The Public Pension Fund Group, Steven J. Sklar, as (IRA Account Beneficiary), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rhonda Wilson, Mark Adams, Vernon C. Dailey and others
Defendant:
Gary Carlin, Nelson Chai, John A. Thain and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, William Barnett, III and others
Stiching Pensioenfonds ABP v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02284
Plaintiff:
Stiching Pensioenfonds ABP
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, Joel L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Weintraub et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02409
Plaintiff:
Michael Weintraub and Joseph Weintraub Family Foundation
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, Joe L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Finger et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02408
Plaintiff:
Jerry E. Finger , Finger Interests Number One, Ltd. , Ambassador Life Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, Joel L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Bahnmaier et al v. Bank of America Corp.
as 1:2010cv01234
Defendant:
Kenneth D. Lewis, Joel L. Price, Jonathan A. Thain and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Bahnmaier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
