Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DON'T SHOOT PORTLAND et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02040
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA HESTER, DANIALLE JAMES, BEVERLEY BARNUM and others
Defendant:
L. ERIC PATTERSON, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, DONALD W. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
MISCHLER v. PENCE et al
as 1:2020cv01863
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, SHANE BAUMGARDNER, KELLY CRAFT and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. LEADER et al
as 1:2020cv01221
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
JEWS MORE GENERALLY, REUBEN SMITH, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CERRATO-GONZALEZ v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00729
Plaintiff:
CERRATO-GONZALEZ and OSMAN DONALD CERRATO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BARR, JOHN #1-#10 DOES, CHAD WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
JOANNE E. JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, KARL A. RACINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANIAR et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2019cv03826
Plaintiff:
ASHRAF MANIAR and UMAIMA SHAIKH
Defendant:
DAVID PEKOSKE, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, CHAD WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv03771
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
