Cases 11 - 20 of 20
BENTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05230
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DAVID ORTIZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE BENTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv04056
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, WILLIAM BARR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
ROSCOE BENTON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CEBALLOS v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv00422
Respondent:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SANTILLIAN CEBALLOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. LONDON BRIDGE KNIFE ATTACK et al
as 2:2019cv21863
Respondent:
CITY OF LONDON, ORLANDO HARPER, MAYOR, JERSEY CITY, NJ and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Golding v. Barr
as 2:2019cv16977
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER and Attorney General WILLIAM BARR
Petitioner:
Karim Golding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILKERSON v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv16215
Respondent:
WILLIAM BARR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID ORTIZ
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. WILKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIVERA v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv14023
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and others
Petitioner:
MANUEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AZOUKI v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv12468
Petitioner:
Charbel Azouki
Respondent:
Attorney General USA William Barr, Kevin McAleenan, WILLIAM BARR and others
Defendant:
Matthew Albence and William Anderson
LEON v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv12076
Respondent:
WILLIAM BARR, KRISTJEN NIELSON, JOHN TSOUKARIS and others
Petitioner:
TURBIDES LEON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ARGUETA ANARIBA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2019cv09135
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, THOMAS DECKER, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
ANGEL ARGUETA ANARIBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
