Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Mahoney v. Ojajuni et al
as 1:2019cv00520
Defendant:
U S Attorney General William Barr, Capt USP Bmt W. Hozapfel, FNU Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney v. Ojajuni et al
as 6:2019cv00472
Defendant:
U S Attorney General William Barr, Capt USP Bmt W. Hozapfel, FNU Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. United States Code Service Title 18 Section 2251(a) et al
as 3:2019cv02377
Defendant:
United States Attorney and Assistants, Known/Unknown Deputies, Texas Penal Code Section 21.11 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Chevron et al
as 3:2019cv00287
Respondent:
NASA Administration, Texico, EPA and others
Petitioner:
In re: Greta Tuneberg and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Patrick Scruggs, United States Director of FBI, United States FBI Sam and others
Petitioner:
Priscilla A. Ellis and Priscilla A Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Looper v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00377
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, Carroll Ellis Haynes, Hon. William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Delores Looper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Leon v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Attorney General, William Barr, United States Department of Justice and National Security Agency
Plaintiff:
Abel De Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Frank Lara and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Barr et al
as 2:2019cv00215
Defendant:
John F. Caraway and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maximo v. Barr
as 4:2019cv02028
Respondent:
William Barr
Petitioner:
Frix Barrios Maximo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
