Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones, Jr. v. Hite et al
as 1:2022cv01284
Defendant:
Ronald Hite, Ronnie and Jimmy L Pride, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Townsend
as 1:2021cv01233
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.93 Acres More Or Less, In Brunswick County, Virginia, Located On Paracel Identification No. 56-88 Identified As Lot No. 6 On That Certain Plat Recorded On February 6, 2017 As Instrument No. 17000024 et al
as 3:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.93 Acres More Or Less, In Brunswick County, Virginia, Located On Paracel Identification No. 56-88 Identified As Lot No. 6 On That Certain Plat Recorded On February 6, 2017 As Instrument No. 17000024 and William Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.94 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE STURGEON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 56-90D et al
as 3:2018cv00521
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.94 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE STURGEON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 56-90D, Tashawanda Robinson-Whitaker, Denise Robinson-Fultze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Waid
as 3:2008cv00697
Petitioner:
William Jones
Respondent:
T. Waid
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
