Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 3:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Edwards v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
William Thomas Edwards
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02403
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02405
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bhakta et al v. Thomas, Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Suryakant Bhakta and Savitaben Bhakta
Defendant:
Eddie Williams Thomas, Jr. and Tri National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nicholas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv00534
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
William Thomas Nicholas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maldonado et al v. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Ibarra, Matthew Dane Rinker, Billy Cambron and others
Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc., Cobra Acquisitions, LLC, 5 Star Electric, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2020cv03510
Plaintiff:
William Thomas and Kimberly Thomas
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Thomas et al
as 4:2019cv00884
Defendant:
Daiquiri Daddi, LLC and William Thomas
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
