Cases 1 - 10 of 34
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27505
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04039
Plaintiff:
SHAUN WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv02022
Plaintiff:
William Wright and Sandra Wright
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
William Wright v. US DOT, et al
as 22-11645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
US DOT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, EAGLE OF AMERICA - ALBANY and others
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64982
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFRAM-TECH INC et al v. CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
AFRAM-TECH INC, CONSEEDCO INC and WILLIAM WRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA, U S DOT, GA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
