Cases 11 - 20 of 253
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Galm v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Paul Galm
Defendant:
State of Oregon, John Malone, Shannon Moshofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saloum v. Tillamook Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv02008
Plaintiff:
Harvey Saloum
Defendant:
Tillamook Oregon, William Brian Porter, Paul Michael Binford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davidson et al v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
Haylee Rose Davidson and Eric Davidson
Defendant:
William Ford, Jr. and Cedar Avenue LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Bell v. Feuerstein et al
as 3:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Cheryl J. Feuerstein, Raylynna J. Peterson, Merchants Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
