Cases 1 - 10 of 3,407
Williams v. Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Williams
Defendant:
Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation and Tyler Groff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Williams v. Pelosi et al
as 5:2024cv00620
Defendant:
John Doe, Zachary Pelosi and Twist
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams Assets, LLC et al v. Garvey et al
as 1:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Williams Assets, LLC and Altenor, LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Garvey, Deutsche Bank National Trust, Turnover, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Williams v. Atkins et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Atkins, Augello, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Udicious v. Bonacci et al
as 6:2024cv06262
Plaintiff:
William R Udicious
Defendant:
Joseph Bonacci, Rochester Police Department and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Stora v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03165
Plaintiff:
Skiboky Stora
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Gene Ruda, Detective Redmond Halpern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
