Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fuelberth v. Mitchell Management Co.
as 8:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
William Fuelberth
Defendant:
Mitchell Management Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fuelberth v. Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
William Fuelberth
Defendant:
Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jorde et al
as 4:2017cv03112
Plaintiff:
Richard Burch, Lindsay Itkin, Brian E. Jorde and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Sortino et al
as 8:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Daniel P. Bracht, Eugene Cannon, Anna Sortino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Preferred Popcorn, LLC v. Williams
as 4:2016cv03194
Plaintiff:
Preferred Popcorn, LLC
Defendant:
Christine Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Smith v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00287
Defendant:
Does 1-100 and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Shea v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03046
Defendant:
William Coble and Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rita Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Sims v. First Data Technologies, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00029
Defendant:
First Data Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Sims, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Eat Out Now, Inc.
as 8:2011cv00022
Defendant:
Eat Out Now, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wallace H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Yost v. I.B.E.W. Local No. 22 et al
as 8:2010cv00197
Defendant:
Edward J. Cizek, III, I.B.E.W. Local No. 22, Gary Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Yost
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
