Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Saadallah v. Interactive Brokers, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
Kamal Saadallah
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers, LLC and William Zois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krieger v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joel Krieger
Defendant:
Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. , John R. Belk , John P Cato and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Arsenault et al v. Berrard et al
as 3:2012cv02386
Plaintiff:
Clarence Arsenault
Defendant:
Steven R. Berrard, Michael J. Kipp, David Braley and others
Movant:
Avron Fogelman
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Galaton v. Johnson et al
as 4:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Martin Galaton
Defendant:
William D. Johnson, John H. Mullin, III, E. Marie McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galaton v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
Martin Galaton
Defendant:
William D. Johnson , John H. Mullin, III , E. Marie McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolf v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Noah Wolf
Defendant:
William D. Johnson , John H. Mullin , E. Marie McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BORCHARDT v. KING, et al
as 1:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BORCHARDT
Defendant:
KELLY S. KING, CHRISTOPHER L HENSON, DARYL N. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
