Cases 1 - 3 of 3
USA v. $225,894.00 US Curr, et al
as 12-3669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$225,894.00 US CURR, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 3209038078, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT CAPITAL ONE, UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO 082428948 HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK 120 HIGHWAY 35 MIDDLETOWN NEW JERSEY 07748 and UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO 674585321 HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT HSBC BANK 1105 NORTH MARKET STREET SUITE 1 WILMINGTON DELAWARE 19801
Claimant - Appellant:
SABAK FAINGOLD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $225,894.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 3209038078, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT CAPITAL ONE et al
as 2:2008cv03533
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$225,894.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 3209038078, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT CAPITAL ONE, UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 082428948, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK, 120 HIGHWAY 35 MIDDLETOWN, NEW JERSEY 07748 and UNITED STATES CURRENCY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NO. 674585321, HELD IN THE NAME OF AND/OR BENEFIT OF ROMAN FAJNGOLD AT HSBC BANK, 1105 NORTH MARKET STREET, SUITE 1, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 1517 Delaware Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware
as 1:2007cv00638
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known as 1517 Delaware Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
