Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woodward (ID 55044) v. Hodge et al
as 5:2016cv03033
Plaintiff:
David L. Woodward
Defendant:
Rick Hodge, (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Freedom Stores, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02254
Plaintiff:
James R. Woodward
Defendant:
Freedom Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Woodward v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2011cv03102
Petitioner:
David L. Woodward
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodward v. Webster
as 6:2010cv01385
Plaintiff:
David Woodward
Defendant:
Phyllis K. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Woodward, The v. First Specialty Insurance Corporation
as 5:2010cv04114
Plaintiff:
Woodward, The
Defendant:
First Specialty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodward et al v. DCCCA Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
James W. Woodward and Destiny Brown
Defendant:
DCCCA Inc., CASA, Randy Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFadden v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 2:2009cv02273
Plaintiff:
Janet Toole, Barbara McGarity, Demetria L. McFadden and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Kimly Coleman, Sally Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Woodward v. Roberts et al
as 5:2007cv03091
Petitioner:
David L Woodward
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keys et al v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ron Keys, Ron Keys, Ron Keys and others
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc., KIIT Company, Inc., Sikh Dharma of New Mexico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
